Category Archives: Research Paper Help

A Comprehensive Guide to Pen Down an Effective Synopsis for PhD in Architecture

Today, research is being conducted in various domains including pure science, engineering, MBA, etc. While many research domains are contributing to the existing knowledge or the society for a long time, there are a few other fields which have emerged as the hottest research field. And one such domain is architecture. Yes, you read it right. Architecture is one of the blooming concepts in the research field. 

After completion of the research, the strenuous task a scholar faces is crafting a research paper. That is, for an architect, the toughest job in his research journey would be defining and penning down his/her study. Writing a research paper involves various steps and the first step towards reaching the goal is crafting an exceptional synopsis. 

A synopsis is nothing but a short, systematic outline of the proposed study, that gives the supervisor a clear picture of study and enable him/her to spot gaps that have not been taken into account. In the architectural field, a synopsis includes: 

  1. Introduction – Like any other domain, this field too includes an introduction as the first section of a research paper. Here briefly explain the architectural/technological/social significance of the study. Be precise and incorporate relevant background materials in this section. 
  2. Objectives, scope and limitations – Precisely state the questions for which you would like to seek an answer. Define the analytical, experimental, conceptual, and/or methodological boundaries within which the research will be carried out. Also explain the limitations of your study and the difficulties involved in performing the research. 
  3. Description of the research work – Considering the limitations and difficulties, precisely identify the architecturally suitable area and extent of study attempted by you. In addition, provide a detailed explanation on how you are seeking architectural solutions and how the case studies will assist you in identifying the solutions. You must also clear the role of literature studies/experiments/observations and define the detailed methodology to be adopted that lead you towards the solutions.
  4. Summary of the study – Highlight significant conclusions you are working towards. Explain the advantages arising out of the study and the architectural advancement you are seeking via your research paper. If you need some assistance in writing this section, consider approaching professional offering PhD synopsis writing services in Bangalore. 
  5. List of case studies – List the case studies and indicate why you have selected the particular case study. Also mention the ease or difficulty of approach, acquiring information from the case studies. 
  6. Project site – As per the writers providing PhD synopsis writing services in Bangalore, one should include a suitable, possible site for the research proposal where the solutions can be carried out. Although the project site may or may not be a live one but must be suitable for the chosen project. 

Your synopsis is one of the critical deciding factors which tell your supervisor what he/she can expect from the study, what makes it unique, and is the topic researchable.

A Guide to Writing a Technical Journal Paper

The Template of a Technical Paper

 

TITLE

 An effective title should…Answer the reader’s question:

  • Is this article relevant to me?
  • Grab the reader’s attention
  • Describe the content of a paper using the fewest possible words
  • Is crisp, concise
  • Uses keywords

Example:

Title selected:

A Human Expert-based Approach to Electrical Peak Demand Management

Title Rejected:

 A better approach of managing environmental and energy sustainability via a study of different methods of electric load forecasting

ABSTRACT

The abstract allows a researcher to quickly evaluate the content of your paper, and judge whether it is relevant to their research. As a result, an abstract need to convey a complete synopsis of the paper, but within a tight word limit.

A standalone condensed version of the article with not more than 250 words which I written in the past tense using keywords.

Writing an abstract includes briefly introducing the general topic of the work and then explaining the exact research question, including the aims. It should then include a brief description of the methodology, the results, and the discussion.

Example:

Good Abstract:

The objective of this paper was to propose a human expert-based approach to electrical peak demand management. The proposed approach helped to allocate demand curtailments (MW) among distribution substations (DS) or feeders in an electric utility service area based on requirements of the central load dispatch center. Demand curtailment allocation was quantified taking into account demand response (DR) potential and load curtailment priority of each DS, which can be determined using DS loading level, capacity of each DS, customer types (residential/commercial) and load categories (deployable, interruptible, or critical). Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used to model a complex decision-making process according to both expert inputs and objective parameters. Simulation case studies were conducted to demonstrate how the proposed approach can be implemented to perform DR using real-world data from an electric utility. Simulation results demonstrated that the proposed approach is capable of achieving realistic demand curtailment allocations among different DSs to meet the peak load reduction requirements at the utility level.

Bad Abstract:

This paper presents and assesses a framework for an engineering capstone design program. We explain how student preparation, project selection, and instructor mentorship are the three key elements that must be addressed before the capstone experience is ready for the students. Next, we describe a way to administer and execute the capstone design experience including design workshops and lead engineers. We describe the importance in assessing the capstone design experience and report recent assessment results of our framework. We comment specifically on what students thought were the most important aspects of their experience in engineering capstone design and provide quantitative insight into what parts of the framework are most important

*First person, present tense No actual results, only describes the organization of the paper

KEYWORDS

The Title and Abstract will be used for enhanced Search Engine Optimization to select the appropriate keywords.

INTRODUCTION

The introduction gives an overall review of the paper, but does address a few slightly different issues from the abstract. It works on the principle of introducing the topic of the paper and setting it in a broader context, gradually narrowing the topic down to a research problem, thesis, and hypothesis. A good introduction explains how you mean to solve the research problem, and creates ‘leads’ to make the reader want to delve further into your work.

An introduction should comprise the description of the problem you researched and should move step by step through, should be written in present tense.

The introduction should not be too broad or vague and should be limited to not more than 2 pages.

METHODOLOGY

The methodology needs to give a completely accurate description of the equipment and the techniques used for gathering the data. Finally, you must provide an explanation of how the raw data was compiled and analyzed.

The methodology can usually be divided into a few sections.

  • Describe the materials and equipment used in the research.
  • Explain how the samples were gathered, any randomization techniques and how the samples were prepared.
  • Explain how the measurements were made and what calculations were performed upon the raw data.
  • Describe the statistical techniques used on the data.
  • Use illustrations to clarify ideas, support conclusions.

The writing for the method should be clear and concise. The major point is not to stray off into giving background info, interpretation, or irrelevant detail. Write from your reader’s perspective. You will not need to explain things they already know, but you will need to paint a precise picture of your methods.

RESULTS/DISCUSSION

Results:

These should be a quick synopsis of the facts, figures and statistical tests used to arrive at your final results.

  • Summarized Data
  • Should be clear and concise
  • Use figures or tables with narrative to illustrate findings

Be sure to include negative results – writing a results section without them not only invalidate the paper, but it is extremely bad science. The negative results, and how you handle them, often gives you the makings of a great discussion section, so do not be afraid to highlight them.

Discussion:

  • Interprets the Results
  • Why your research offers a new solution
  • Acknowledge any limitations

You should always put your findings into the context of the previous research that you found during your literature review. Do your results agree or disagree with previous research?

Do the results of the previous research help you to interpret your own findings? If your results are very different, why? Either you have uncovered something new, or you may have made a major flaw with the design of the experiment.

Finally, after saying all of this, you can make a statement about whether the experiment has contributed to knowledge in the field, or not.

CONCLUSION

Conclusion explain what the research has achieved. This is a very quick synopsis of the results and discussion. Writing a conclusion involves summing up the paper and giving a very brief description of the results, although you should not go into too much detail about this.

When writing a conclusion, you should try to answer a few questions, as succinctly as possible:

  • It relates to the problem stated in the Introduction
  • Include a summary of the main findings, important conclusions, and implications for the field
  • Provides benefits and shortcomings of the solution presented and research methodology. You should then point out the importance of the study and point out how it relates to the field. Whilst writing the conclusion, you should highlight any deficiencies in your methods, explaining how they may have affected your results.

Suggests future areas for research, do your findings open up any suggestions for future research?

REFERENCES

Support and validate the hypothesis your research proves, disproves, or resolves

  • There is no limit to the number of references
  • But use only those that directly support our work Ensure proper author attribution
  • Author name, article title, publication name, publisher, year published, volume, chapter, and page number

IEEE journals generally follow a citation numbering system

FINAL TASK OF WRITERS ONCE ALL SECTIONS ARE WRITTEN:

  • How do they fit together?
  • Does each section perform its appointed task?
  • Is the order logical?
  • Do the ideas flow together? Is it easy to read?
  • Does the same material appear more than ones?
  • Can it be clearer?
  • Is there enough detail?

LIST OF PHRASES THAT COULD BE USED IN WRITING RESEARCH PAPER:

Lists of frequently used phrases that have a general acceptance in all disciplines that you can use in specific sections of writing paper:

  1. Establishing why your topic (X) is important

X is the main / leading / primary / major cause of ..

Xs are a common / useful / critical part of…

Xs are among the most widely used / commonly discussed / well-known / well-documented / widespread / commonly investigated types of …

X is recognized as being / believed to be / widely considered to be the most important …

 It is well known / generally accepted / common knowledge that X is …

X is increasingly becoming / set to become a vital factor in …

Xs are undergoing a revolution / generating considerable interest in terms of …

 Xs are attracting considerable / increasing / widespread interest due to …

X has many uses / roles / applications in the field of …

A striking / useful / remarkable feature of …

The main / principal / fundamental characteristics of X are: X accounts / is responsible for

  1. Outlining the past-present history of the study of X (no direct references to the literature)

Last century X was considered to be / viewed as / seen as the most …

Initial / Preliminary / The first studies of X considered it to be Traditionally X / In the history of X, the focus has always been …

Scientists / Researchers / Experts have always seen X as …

Until now / For many years / Since 1993 Xs have been considered as …

X has received much attention in the last two years / in the past decade / over the last two decades …

For the past five years / Since 2011 there has been a rapid rise in the use of Xs

The last two years have witnessed / seen a huge growth in X …

The past decade / last year has seen a renewed importance in X …

Recent developments in / findings regarding X have led to …

X has become a central / an important / a critical issue in …

  1. Outlining the possible future of X

The next decade is likely to see / witness a considerable rise in X In the next few years X will become / is likely to have become Within the next few years, X is set / destined / likely to become an important component in …

By 2025 / Within the next ten years, X will have become …

X will soon / shortly / rapidly / inevitably be an issue that …

  1. Indicating the gap in knowledge and possible limitations

 Few researchers have addressed the problem / issue / question of … Previous work has only focused on / been limited to / failed to address …

A basic / common / fundamental / crucial / major issue of …

The central / core problem of A challenging / An intriguing / An important / A neglected area in the field of …

Current solutions to X are inconsistent / inadequate / incorrect / ineffective / inefficient / oversimplistic / unsatisfactory Many hypotheses regarding X appear to be ill-defined / unfounded / not well grounded / unsupported / questionable / disputable / debatable

The characteristics of X are not well understood / are misunderstood / have not been dealt with in depth. It is not yet known / has not yet been established whether X can do Y. X is still poorly / not widely understood. X is often impractical / not feasible / costly …

Techniques to solve X are computationally demanding / subject to high overheads / time consuming / impractical / frequently unfeasible. A major defect / difficulty / drawback / disadvantage / flaw of X is …

One of the main issues in our knowledge of / what we know about X is a lack of …

 This particular / specific area of X has been overlooked / has been neglected / remains unclear …

Despite this interest, no one to the best of our knowledge / as far as we know has studied … Although this approach is interesting, it suffers from / fails to take into account / does not allow for …

In spite of / Despite its shortcomings, this method has been widely applied to …

However, there is still a need for / has been little discussion on …

Moreover, other solutions / research programs / approaches have failed to provide …

Most studies have only focused / tended to focus on …

To date / Until now this methodology has only been applied to …

There is still some / much / considerable controversy surrounding …

There has been some disagreement concerning / regarding / with regard to whether There is little / no general agreement on …

The community has raised some issues / concerns about …

Concerns have arisen / been raised which question / call into question the validity of …

 In the light of recent events in x, there is now some / much / considerable concern about …

  1. Stating the aim of your paper and its contribution

 In this report / paper / review / study we …

 This paper outlines / proposes / describes / presents a new approach to …

 This paper examines / seeks to address / focuses on / discusses / investigates how to solve … This paper is an overview of / a review of / a report on / a preliminary attempt to …

The present paper aims to validate / call into question / refute Peng’s findings regarding …

 X is presented / described / analyzed / computed / investigated / examined / introduced / discussed in order to …

The aim of our work / research / study / analysis was to further / extend / widen / broaden current knowledge of …

 Our knowledge of X is largely based on very limited data.

The aim of the research was thus / therefore / consequently to

 The aim of this study is to study / evaluate / validate / determine / examine / analyze / calculate / estimate / formulate …

 This paper calls into question / takes a new look at / re-examines / revisits / sheds new light on …

With this in mind / Within the framework of these criteria / In this context we tried to …

We undertook this study / initiated this research / developed this methodology to

We believe that we have found / developed / discovered / designed an innovative solution to…

We describe / present / consider / analyze a novel / simple / radical / interesting solution for … 6. Explaining the key terminology in your field

 The term ‘X’ is generally understood to mean / has come to be used to refer to / has been applied to …

 In the literature, X usually refers / often refers / tends to be used to refer to …

 In the field of X, several / various / many definitions of Y can be found.

The term X is / was / has been used by Molotov [2011] to refer to …

Molotov uses the term X [2011] to refer to / denominate …

 X is defined by Peng [1990] to refer to / to mean …

Vitous [2015] has provided / put forward / proposed a new definition of X, in which …

X is defined / identified / described as …

[Njimi 2004]. In the literature there seems to be no general definition of X / a general definition of X is lacking / there is no clear definition of X. Several authors have attempted to define X, but as yet / currently / at the time of writing there is still no accepted definition. In broad / general terms, X is / can be defined as a way to …

The broad / general / generally accepted use of the term X refers to …

X is sometimes equated with / embodies a series of …

X, Y and Z are three kinds / types / categories / classes of languages.

There are three kinds of languages: / The three kinds of languages are: / Languages can be divided into three kinds: X, Y and Z.

  1. Explaining how you will use terminology and acronyms in your paper

The acronym PC stands for / denotes …

 The subjects (henceforth named / hereafter ‘X’) are…

The subject, which we shall call / refer to as ‘X’, is …

Throughout this paper / section we use the terms ‘mafia’ and ‘the mob’ interchangeably, following / in accordance with the practice of this department where this study was conducted. The fonts, i.e. / that is to say the form of the characters, are of various types.

There are three different types, namely / specifically: X, Y and Z. Throughout the / In this paper we use / will use the term X to refer to …

 In this chapter X is used / will be used to refer to …

 In this paper the standard meaning of X is / will be used.

This aspect is / will be dealt with in more detail in Sect. 2. We will see / learn / appreciate how relevant this is in the next subsection.

  1. Giving the structure of paper – what is and is not included

 This paper is organized as follows / divided into five sections.

The first section / Section 1 gives a brief overview of …

The second section examines / analyses …

In the third section a case study is presented / analyzed …

A new methodology is described / outlined in the fourth section …

We / I propose a new procedure in Section 4. Some / Our conclusions are drawn in the final section. This paper / chapter / section / subsection begins by examining …

 The next chapter looks at / examines / investigates the question of …

 Problems / Questions / Issues regarding X are discussed in later sections. A discussion of Y is / falls outside the scope of this paper. For reasons of space, Y is not addressed / dealt with / considered in this paper. 9. Giving general panorama of past-to-present literature There is a considerable / vast amount of literature on …

 In the literature there are many / several / a surprising number of / few examples of

What we know / is known about X is largely based on …

Much / Not much / Very little is known about …

 Many / Few studies have been published on …

[Ref] Various approaches have been proposed / put forward / suggested / hypothesized to solve this issue [Ref]. X has been identified / indicated as being …

[Ref] X has been shown / demonstrated / proved / found to be …

 [Ref] X has been widely investigated / studied / addressed …

 [Ref] Xs have been receiving / gaining much attention due to …

 In the traditional / classical approach, X is used to …

In recent years there has been considerable / growing interest in …

[Ref] A growing body of literature has examined / investigated / studied / analyzed / evaluated…

[Ref] Much work on the potential of X has been carried out [Ref], yet / however there are still some critical issues … [Ref]

  1. Reviewing subsequent and more recent literature

Experiments on X were conducted / carried out / performed on X in 2009 by a group of researchers from …

In a major advance in 2010, Berlusconi et al. surveyed / interviewed …

 Jeffries and co-workers [2011] measured / calculated / estimated …

In [67] the authors investigated / studied / analyzed …

A recent review of the literature on this topic / subject / matter / area [2012] found that …

 A number / An increasing number of studies have found that …

Since 2011 / In the last few years, much more information on X has become available … Several studies, for example / instance [1], [2], and [6], have been carried out / conducted / performed on X. More recent evidence [Obama, 2013] shows / suggests / highlights / reveals / proposes that …

 It has now been suggested / hypothesized / proposed / shown / demonstrated that …

[Cosimo 2010] Many attempts have been made [Kim 2009, Li 2010, Hai 2011] in order to / with the purpose of / aimed at …

Mentioning positive aspects of others’ work Smith’s [22] use of X is fully justified / very plausible / endorsed by experience. Kamos’s [23] assumptions seem to be realistic / well-founded / well-grounded / plausible / reasonable / acceptable. The equations given in [24] are accurate / comprehensive …

 It has been suggested [25] that … and this seems to be a reliable / useful / innovative approach … Research has tended to focus on X rather than Y. An additional problem is that / Moreover X is

The main limitation / downside / disadvantage / pitfall / shortfall of X is … One of the major drawbacks to adopting / using / exploiting this system is …

This is something of a pitfall / disadvantage … A well-known / major / serious criticism of X is

A key problem with much of the literature on / regarding / in relation to X is that …

This raises many questions about / as to / regarding whether X should be used for … One question / issue that needs to be asked / raised is … Unfortunately, it does not / fails to / neglects to explain why … This method suffers from a number / series / plethora of pitfalls. There is still considerable ambiguity / disagreement / uncertainty with regard to …

Many experts contend, however / instead / on the other hand, that this evidence is not conclusive. A related hypothesis holds / maintains that X is equal to Y, suggesting / indicating that …

Other observations indicate / would seem to suggest that this explanation is insufficient …

9.Describing purpose of testing / methods used

In order to identify / understand / investigate / study / analyze X …

To enable / allow us to … , we … To see / determine / check / verify / determine whether … To control / test for X, Y was done. So that we could / would be able to do X, we …

In an attempt / effort to do X, we … X was done / We did X in order to …

The setup we used can be found / is reported / is detailed in [Ref 2]. Our experimental set up bears a close resemblance to / is reminiscent of / is based on / is a variation on / was inspired by / owes a lot to / is more or less identical to / is practically the same as the one proposed by Smith [2014]. We used a variation of Smith’s procedure.

The procedure used is as described / explained / reported / proposed by Sakamoto [2013]. The method is in line with a variation of / essentially the same as that used by Kirk [2009] with some changes / modifications / alterations / adjustments. We refined / altered / adapted / modified / revised the method used / reported / suggested / explained / proposed / put forward by Bing [2012]. Our technique was loosely / partially / partly / to some extent based on … More details can be found / are given in our previous paper [35].

  1. Describing the apparatus and materials used and their source

The instrument used / utilized / adopted / employed was …

The apparatus consists of / is made up of / is composed of / is based on …

The device was designed / developed / set up in order to …

X incorporates / exploits / makes use of the latest technological advances. The system comes complete / is equipped / is fully integrated / is fitted with a …

 It is mounted on / connected to / attached to / fastened to / fixed to / surrounded by / covered with / integrated into / embedded onto / encased in / housed in / aligned with … It is located in / situated in / positioned on ….

  1. Reporting software used

The software application / program / package used to analyze the data was SoftGather (Softsift plc, London).

The data were obtained / collected using SoftGather. Data management / analysis was performed by / using SoftGather.

X was carried out / performed / analyzed / calculated / determined using SoftGather. Statistical significance was analyzed by using / through the use of SoftGather.

 We used commercially available software / a commercially available software package. Free software, downloaded from www.free.edu, was used / adopted to …

  1. Reporting customizations performed

 X was tailored / customized for use with …

X can easily be customized / adapted / modified to suit all requirements.

Measurements were taken using purpose-built / custom-built / customized equipment.

The apparatus was adapted as in [Ref] / in accordance with [Ref] / as follows:

The following changes / modifications were made:

The resulting ad hoc device can / is able to / has the capacity to …

  1. Formulating equations, theories, and theorems

This problem can be outlined / phrased / posed in terms of …

The problem is ruled by / governed by / related to / correlated to …

This theorem asserts / states that …

 The resulting integrals / solution to X can be expressed as … …

 where T stands for / denotes / identifies / is an abbreviation for time. By substituting / Substituting / Substitution into …

 Combining / Integrating / Eliminating ..

we have that: … Taking advantage of / Exploiting / Making use of X, we …

On combining this result with X, we deduce / conclude that … Subtracting X from Y, we have that / obtain / get …

Equation 1 shows / reveals that This gives the formal solution / allows a formal solution to be found … It may easily / simply verified that …

 It is straightforward / easy / trivial to verify that …

 For the sake of simplicity / reasons of space, we

  1. Explaining why you chose your specific method, model, equipment, sample etc.

The aim / purpose of X is to do Y. Consequently we / As a result we / Therefore we / We thus This method / model / system was chosen because it is one of the most practical / feasible / economic / rapid ways to …

 We chose this particular apparatus because / on account of the fact that / due to / since …

 It was decided that the best procedure / method / equipment for this investigation / study was to …

An X approach was chosen / selected in order to …

The design of the X was based on / is geared towards …

We opted for / chose a small sample size because / due to / on the basis of …

By having / By exploiting / Through the use of X, we were able to …

Having an X enabled us to / allowed us to / meant that we could do Y. 24. Explaining the preparation of samples, solutions etc. We used reliable / innovative / classic / traditional techniques based on the recommendations of …

 Xs were prepared as described by / according to / following Jude [2010]. Xs were prepared in accordance with / in compliance with / as required by….

Y was prepared using the same / a similar procedure as for X. All samples were carefully / thoroughly checked for …

X was gradually / slowly / rapidly / gently heated

The final / resulting solutions contained … This was done by means of / using / with a calculator.

  1. Describing benefits of your method, equipment etc.

This method represents a viable / valuable / useful / groundbreaking / innovative alternative to

This equipment has the ability / capacity / potential to outperform all previous Xs. This apparatus has several / many interesting features / characteristics. Our method has many interesting / attractive / beneficial / useful / practical / effective / valuable applications. Of particular / major / fundamental interest is …

The key / basic / chief / crucial / decisive / essential / fundamental / important / main / major / principal advantages are: Our procedure is a clear improvement / advance on current methods. We believe this solution will aid / assist researchers to …

This solution improves on / enhances / furthers / advances previous methods by …

The benefits / advantages in terms of X far outweigh the disadvantages with regard to Y. 30. Outlining alternative approaches.

A less lengthy / time-consuming / cumbersome / costly approach is …

 A neater / more elegant / simplified / more practical solution for this problem …

 An alternative solution, though with high overheads / slightly more complicated / less exhaustive is …

One / One possible / A good way to avoid the use of X is to use Y instead.

  1. Explaining how you got your results

To assess X / evaluate X / distinguish between X and Y, Z was used. X analysis was used to test / predict / confirm Y. Changes in X were identified / calculated / compared using …

The correlation / difference between X and Y was tested. The first set of analyses investigated / examined / confirmed / highlighted the impact of …

  1. Highlighting significant results and achievements

The most striking / remarkable result to emerge from the data is that …

Interestingly / Curiously / Remarkably / Inexplicably, this correlation is related to …. Significantly / Importantly / Crucially / Critically, X is …

The correlation between X and Y is interesting / of interest / worth noting / noteworthy / worth mentioning because …

The most surprising / remarkable / intriguing correlation is with the …

The single most striking / conspicuous / marked observation to emerge from the data comparison was …

It is interesting / critical / crucial / important / fundamental to note that …

We believe that / As far as we know / As far as we aware this is the first time that X …

 We believe that / We are of the opinion that / In our view the result emphasizes the validity of our model. This result has further strengthened our confidence in X / conviction that X is / hypothesis that X is …

Our technique shows a clear / clearly has an advantage over …

 The importance of X cannot be stressed / emphasized too much. This underlines / highlights / stresses / proves / demonstrates just how important X is. The utility of X is thus underlined / highlighted / stressed / proved / demonstrated. This finding confirms / points to / highlights / reinforces / validates the usefulness of X as a …

 Our study provides additional support for / further evidence for / considerable insight into X. These results extend / further / widen our knowledge of X. These results offer compelling / indisputable / crucial / overwhelming / powerful / invaluable / unprecedented / unique / vital evidence for …

  1. Stating that your results confirm previous evidence

Our experiments confirm / corroborate / are in line with / are consistent with previous results [Wiley 2009]. The values are barely / scarcely / hardly distinguishable from [Li 2010] who …

This value has been found to be / is typical of X. This is in good agreement / in complete agreement / consistent with …

 This fits / matches / concurs well with [65] and also confirms our earlier / previous findings [39, 40, 41]. This confirms / supports / lends support to / substantiates previous findings in the literature …

These values correlate favorably / satisfactorily / fairly well with Svenson [2009] and further support the idea / role / concept of …

 Further tests carried out with X confirmed / corroborated / concurred with our initial findings. As proposed / suggested / reported / indicated / put forward by Dong [2011], the evidence we found points to …

Our results share / have a number of similarities with Claire et al.’s [2012] findings …

  1. Stating that your results are in contrast with previous evidence

It was found that X = 2, whereas / on the other hand Kamatchi [2011] found that …

 We found much higher values for X than / with respect to those reported by Pandey [2000]. Although / Despite the fact that Li and Mithran [2014] found that X = 2 we found that X = 3. In contrast to / contradiction with earlier findings [Castenas, 2009], we …

 This study has not confirmed previous research on X. However, / Nevertheless / Despite this, it serves to …

Even though these results differ from some published / previous / earlier studies (Cossu, 2001; Triana, 2002), they are consistent with those of …

 Kosov et al. noted that x = y. Our results do not support / appear to corroborate / seem to confirm their observation, in fact …

 Georgiev is correct to argue / propose / claim that x = y. However, his calculation only referred to the limited case of ….

 and our conclusion of x = z, would thus seem to be justified / justifiable / defensible / correct / acceptable / warranted. Although our results differ slightly / to some extent / considerably from those of Minhaz [2001], Erturk [2007], and Hayk [2014], it can / could nevertheless be argued that … Our findings do / The current study does not support previous research in this area. In fact, contrary to / unlike / in contrast with what was previously thought, we found that …

These findings refute / disprove / are in contradiction with / contrast with / significantly differ from previous results reported in the literature. 38. Stating and justifying the acceptability of your results

As expected / anticipated / predicted / forecast / hypothesized, our experiments show / demonstrate / prove that …

Our formula captures / reproduces the response of …

Apart from this slight discordance / discrepancy / disagreement / non-alignment, the result is confirmation of … Despite / Notwithstanding the lack of agreement, we believe our findings compare well with … Although / Even though / Despite the fact that there was some inconsistency …

There is satisfactory / good / exceptional / perfect agreement between …

No significant / substantial / appreciable / noteworthy differences were found … Our findings appear to be well substantiated / supported by …

The number of Xs that confirmed our findings was appreciable / significant / substantial.

  1. Explaining and justifying undesired or unexpected results

 It is very likely / probable / possible that participants may have erroneously …

 and this may have led to / brought about changes in …

The prime / primary / foremost cause of the discrepancy is due to / a result of / a consequence of X. This apparent lack of correlation can be attributed to / explained by / justified by …

The reason for this rather contradictory result is still not entirely / completely clear, but … There are several possible explanations for this result / finding / outcome.

These differences can be explained / justified / accounted for in part by …

It can thus be suggested / conceivably hypothesized / reasonably assumed that …

 The unexpectedly high / low level of X is undoubtedly / certainly / without any doubt due to A possible / reasonable / satisfactory explanation for X may be that ….

 Another possible explanation / rationalization / reason for this is that … Clearly / Evidently / Naturally there may be other possible explanations. This happened / occurred / may have happened / may have occurred because we had not examined X sufficiently / in enough depth due to …

 The reasons for this result are not yet wholly / completely / entirely understood. It cannot be ruled out / ignored that there was some unintended bias in …

 An unintended bias cannot be ruled out / should be taken into consideration. We cannot rule out that X might / may have influenced Y. The observed increase in X could be attributed to / might be explained by it / could be interpreted as being a result of …

Despite the fact that / Although X was expected to do Y, it was not predicted that X would also do Z. However, this is not particularly surprising given the fact / in light of the fact / if we consider that …

  1. Announcing your conclusions and summarizing content

 In conclusion / In summary / In sum / To sum up, our work …

Our work has led us to conclude / the conclusion that …

We have presented / outlined / described …

In this paper / study / review we have …

This paper has investigated / explained / given an account of …

have obtained accurate / satisfactory / comprehensive results proving / demonstrating / showing that …

have devised a methodology / procedure / strategy which … We have confirmed / provided further evidence / demonstrated that …

Considerable progress has been made / insight has been gained with regard to …

The present study has only investigated / examined X. Therefore / Consequently …

The project / analysis / testing / sampling was limited in several ways. First, …

 Finally, a number of potential limitations / weaknesses / shortfalls / shortcomings / weak points need to be considered. First, …

However, given the small sample size, caution must be exercised / taken / used / applied. The findings might not be transferable to / generalized to / representative of …

The present findings might help to solve / have important implications for solving / suggest several courses of action in order to solve this problem. X is suitable for / has the potential to

Our method / technique / approach / procedure could be applied to …

 One possible / potential / promising application of our technique would be … Results so far have been very promising / encouraging and …

 This approach has the potential / requirements / characteristics / features to …

This could eventually / conceivably / potentially / hypothetically lead to …

  1. Future work already underway or planned by the authors We are currently / now / in the process of investigating … Research into solving this problem is already underway / in progress. To further our research, we plan / are planning / intend to …

 Future work will concentrate on / focus on / explore / investigate / look into …

Further studies, which take X into account, will need to be undertaken / performed. We hope that further tests will prove our theory / confirm our findings. These topics are reserved for / deferred to future work.

  1. Future work proposed for third parties to carry out

 Further work needs to be done / carried out / performed to establish whether …

 Further experimental investigations / tests / studies are needed to estimate …

 More / Additional / Further work on X, would help us to do Y. We hope / believe / are confident that our research will serve as a base for future studies on …

 It is recommended / We recommend / We suggest / We propose that further research should be undertaken in the following areas: More broadly / On a wider level, research is also needed to determine ….

This research has raised / given rise to / thrown up many questions in need of further investigation / study / examination. This is an important / a fundamental / a vital issue for future research.

The design and development of Xs will challenge / be a challenge for us for years. Future work should concentrate / focus on enhancing the quality of X.

Future studies should target / aim at / examine / deal with / address X.

Future studies on the current topic are therefore required / needed / recommended / suggested in order to establish / verify / validate / elucidate …

 Our results are encouraging / promising and should be validated by a larger sample size.

  1. Referring to tables and figures, and to their implications

Table 1 compares / lists / details / summarizes the data on X. Table 2 proves / shows / demonstrates / illustrates / highlights that X is …

Figure 1 presents / reports / shows / details the data on X. Figure 3 pinpoints / indicates exactly where X meets Y. As shown / highlighted / illustrated / detailed / can be seen in Fig. 1, the value of …

The value of X is greater when Y = 2 (Fig. 1 / Eq. 2) The results on X can be seen / are compared / are presented in Fig. 1. From the graph / photo / chart / histogram we can see / note that …

It can be seen in / is apparent from Fig. 1 that …

We observe / note from Table 1 that .. The graph above / below / to the left / to the right shows that …

Figure 8 shows a clear trend / significant difference in … The table is revealing / interesting in several ways. First …

  1. Making transitions, focusing on a new topic

 If we now turn to / Turning now to / Let us know look at the second part …

As far as X is / Xs are concerned …

As regards / Regarding / Regarding the use of / As for X, it was found that …

  1. Referring backwards and forwards in the paper

As was mentioned / stated / noted / discussed / reported in the Methods, …

reported above / previously / earlier / before …

As mentioned / stated / outlined in the literature review …

above- / afore-mentioned X is …

More details on this will be given below / in the next section / in the appendix. The following is / Here follows / Below is a list of …

Please refer to Appendix 2 / Table 6 / the Supplementary Material for

 

IEEE TEMPLATE:

 

What after the dissertation? A new beginning again…….

Getting a doctorate is not the end of the journey for a researcher. This is more true when we talk of an academician because in the life of an academician, regular publications are integral for not just growth prospects but also for the sake of mere survival. You can mine your dissertation for one or more articles or convert it into a book and give a new life and dimension to your PhD research study.

Even if you have given a couple of mandatory publications during your PhD study, there would surely be a chunk of research that you did in your PhD that would be untouched and would have a scope for publication. All that is required, is to repurpose the dissertation and give it a new life.

The new beginning for your dissertation can be by either attempting to create it into a book or else a couple of scholarly articles could be extracted from it. In most of the cases what is observed is that those in the humanities discipline often convert their dissertation into a book while those in social sciences prefer to publish scholarly articles.

It is always a good idea to take into account the trend and expectations of your department and discipline. If most of your peers are into converting their thesis into books then you must also follow suit.This depends primarily on  the ranking of books and articles in your institution. Sometimes three refereed publications are considered equivalent to publishing a book. If these kind of norms are not explicitly specified in your university, you can gauge about the criteria by assessing the trend of the scholarly work of the other faculty members in your institution and the kind of promotions and benefits they have availed from it.

So, by now you are very clear that there is much more to research after completing your PhD. The hard work and effort that you put into your research during your doctoral study can be given a new dimension and life and further brighten your professional prospects. Further on we would also walk through the process of getting your thesis book ready and the step by step process to break your manuscript into worthy articles that can add on to your profile as a researcher and give you an ace in your professional appraisal and a new life to your PhD thesis.

5 trending PhD research topics in Big Data

In the past decade, Big Data has emerged as a powerful technology tool and is growing in leaps and bounds. There are a number of industry sectors in which PhD research is being conducted for Big Data, including Ecommerce, banking, insurance, telecom, and the health sector.

There are a number of quality research programs being pursued by PhD scholars on the vast and growing field of Big Data. While the maximum number of Big Data research papers is in the field of computer science (171), other academic fields for this line of research include Engineering (75), Mathematics (33), and Business Management (26).

Listed below are the 5 trending research topics being pursued by PhD scholars around the globe:

  • Big Data analytics

Big Data analytics tool has emerged as a powerful tool used to harness the potential use of big data for industry-specific uses. A number of E-commerce retailers are using analytics for online sales conversion and determining customer behaviour. Other potential use is in the performance improvement of sporting athletes.

  • Improving the quality of healthcare

Currently, research is being conducted in the areas of drug discovery, drug response, bioinformatics, clinical data analysis, and public health data. According to the Mckinsey report on Big Data in 2011, Big Data has the potential of reducing the US national health care costs by around 8%.

  • Data visualization

Big Data users are able to see and analyse big data sets using much improved visualization tools. The advent of touch-sensitive navigation has brought huge improvements in interactive visualization technology.

  • Hadoop framework

Research on Apache Hadoop framework is aimed at developing software applications that can be deployed on a larger and distributed network. Deployed across network clusters, the Hadoop framework has been used by a host of popular web platforms including Twitter, LinkedIn, Amazon, and Facebook. Other research topics include the MapReduce programming model, used for executing code for processing large amounts of data over distributed network clusters.

  • Distributed Storage systems

Other areas of PhD research include the efficient way of storing volumes of data over large-scale distributed network clusters. Examples include the Google File System used for storing high-data applications over distributed systems, and Bigtable used for structured storage of Big data.

The constant evolution of Big Data presents researchers with dynamic challenges, while also presenting them with opportunities of determining the evolution of science.

Know About the Trending Research Areas in Computer Science

4 Months of brain explosion and still have no clue about your research topic?

Well, not your fault!  Computer Science can give a hard time to anyone who wants to proceed the research within. It’s a discipline that extents theory and practice and confuses scholars in deciding their research topic.

Research candidates perceive computer science as the ‘Science of Problem Solving’ and adept at modelling and analyzing problems. The problem solving in computer science requires creativity, precision and careful reasoning.

Computer Scientists claim that the opportunities of specialization within the computer science field are extensive and new specialization areas evolve as the changes are made  in computer hardware and software.

After consulting with a team of professors at Department of Computer Science from University of Caltech, we have prepared a list of trending research areas to help candidate in selecting their research topics.

Research Areas Description Research Topics
BigData Now, managing velocity, volume and variety of BigData is possible with the help of software. So the recent trend in the industry is shifting towards the use of analysis to extract the value of data.
  1. Analyzing the importance of ‘filtering’ and ‘tagging’ on data generated.
  2. Optimization of data analytic techniques
  3. Analyzing tools and deployment platforms for BigData
IoT (Internet of Things) The IoT gives a lot to think about to the IT managers. It represents a vision in which the internet extends into the real world espousing everyday basics. It drives difficult changes in organizational structure to allow transparent innovation for everyone.
  1. Security Risk & challenges in IoT communication
  2. Analyzing the Gauge Charts and Spline Charts for IoT sensor readings
  3. Text-to-speech broadcast using IoT sensors
Swarm Intelligence Swarm Intelligence is the collective behavior of self-organized, decentralized system, natural or artificial.
  1. Optimizing the routing protocols for VANET using swarm intelligence
  2. Analyzing ACO with genetic algorithm
  3. Implementation of AODV protocol for MANET using ACO
Cryptography & Network Security Cryptography is an indispensable tool for information protection. The scope of cryptography isn’t limited to scrambling and interpreting the text, in fact it holds a lot in terms of research trends.
  1. Analyzing & optimizing quantum key distribution
  2. Implementing hybrid AES using RSA and DES
  3. Detection and analysis of Black Hole Attack

We hope the above table will help you choosing your research topic. For more info, drop an email at contact@thesisandcode.com.

A guide to getting your research paper published in IEEE (Guide Part-1)

After getting yourself enrolled in a PhD program, you must be scared of getting your research paper published in reputed scientific journals such as IEEE, Springer, Journal of fundamental programming and NASA Tech Brief etc.

Thesis & Code has come up with this unique idea of letting your publication worries go away and providing you with the detailed guidelines to follow for a successful publication in IEEE.

As a practicing engineer or a researcher, it is important for you to publish the result of your work. Publication is not just about getting recognition or career advancement, it’s a critical step in the scientific process.

Your discoveries will help advance technology and foster innovation for the public good, but this can only happen if your research can be understood, read and built upon by future engineers and researchers.

Our Thesis & Code guide will help you in getting published.

(Learning how to prepare, write and submit your paper for peer review by an IEEE conference magazine from the qualified and expert team of Thesis & Code.)

The guide will cover the following sections:

  1. Conducting the literature Review
  2. Ethics in Publishing
  3. Select an Appropriate Format
  4. Choosing Where To Submit
  5. Developing Manuscript
  6. Improving & Revising
  7. Submissions
  8. Peer Review
  9. The Final Steps

Prof. Jackwell, Head of research board at Thesis & Code, advises that to be a successful author, it is important to structure quality work to improve your chances of being accepted and to encourage excellence and technological innovation for the benefits of mankind.

Prof. Jackwell adds, where you publish matters, everyone wants to know that the information they cite come from a credible publication. Over more than 100 years IEEE has always been a trusted source for researchers in government, academia, and corporations.

Here is what expert team at Thesis & Code suggests,

Before Getting Started:

If you want to publish your work, you should not write just for publishing sake or to acquire citations for your curriculum vitae. If you are following this rule than surviving peer review will be a daunting process.

If you are planning to publish your work ask below-mentioned questions to yourself, said Research Expert, Thomas Taylor at Thesis & Code:

  1. Is this an important problem related to your field or is the data collected and analyzed of interest to the wider community?
  2. What has been done in the past?
  3. Does the research significantly advance the state of your field?

As per Taylor, the answers to these questions will be answered only understanding the relevant literature

1)    Conducting the Literature Search:

The research problem you are going to answer must contribute important and new knowledge to your field.

A thorough review of the published work will help. Taylor suggests, as an author, you must be able to show readers and reviewers that you understand what has been done before and that your findings add same new understanding to the field.

Though it’s not seen that all of the resources you identify in the literature review will become references for your work.

The references will be used in the introduction and the discussion chapter to show how you are making a remarkable contribution to your field of study.

The internet has made it too easy to find the information. A well-researched strategy is needed to find the most relevant literature to your work. Your first choice may be to start your search with google or any other search engines. This approach of yours will generate thousands of results, and most of them will be irrelevant to your research, said Taylor.

He suggests following two options to go with for a relevant literature review:

IEEE Xplore Digital Library:

IEEE Xplore is a digital library that offers a robust interface to help in discover and access scientific content from IEEE and its publishing partners. Xplore provides access to more than 3.5 million full texts published documents.

Bibliographic Databases:

There are many databases such as Compendex and Inspec, who has experienced engineering writers. These databases will help in identifying references from a broad selection of literature.

2) Ethics in Publishing:

Prof Jackwell said that IEEE takes ethics quite seriously and does not tolerate fraudulent publication and research. Your submission will be screened thoroughly and if you have violated any standard of publication, depending upon the nature of violation IEEE will take corrective actions.

He suggested below-mentioned guidelines to ensure that your work is beyond rebuke:

Author’s Front:

The roles and responsibilities of an author are clearly defined by IEEE. As per IEEE, the authorship and co-authorship should be based on the substantial intellectual contribution. An author is someone who is responsible for the work developed.

The list of the perpetrators should include only those who had a significant contribution in its development. It can be considered a breach if you omit an author who had contributed significantly to the work or if you include a person who did not has much to do with the development of the paper.

Mentioning an author who didn’t contribute significantly to an article is a violation of IEEE ethics.

Provide a list of authors that includes a description of each person’s contribution to the article.

Citation of Original Work:

Plagiarism:

If you are reviewing the literature you come across something that attracts your attention, you copy it and paste it into your work.

Do not do it!

Copying someone else’s work word-to-word or even paraphrasing what another author has written without proper attribution is plagiarism.

IEEE does not tolerate any form of plagiarism. It defines plagiarism as the misuse of someone else’s ideas, results, processes without explicitly acknowledging the original source or author.

IEEE Recognizes Five Degrees of Plagiarism:

  1. Copying someone else’s entire article, or a major portion of the article, without credit to the original author(s) or copying your own previously published work.
  2. Copying a large proportion (20-50%) of someone else’s work, or your own previous work, without credit.
  3. Copying without credit individual elements such as paragraphs, sentences, or illustrations, resulting in a significant portion (up to 20%) of an article.
  4. Uncredited paraphrasing of pages or paragraphs from another source.
  5. Credited verbatim copying of a major portion of an article without clear delineation, such as quotes or indents.

Redundant Publication:

As an author or co-author, you should not submit your paper for review to more than one publication. Multiple publication waste space and fund and reduces the value of paper to its readers and create a problem with indexing and citation. IEEE uses plagiarism detection software to screen every submitted paper.

Copyright:

Copyrighting is a way of protecting your intellectual property. By maintaining copyrights, IEEE can make the content widely available. If you are publishing your work in any reputed journal you can transfer the copyright to that organization as well.

Fabrication Of data:

There may be legitimate difference in opinion about research and of course, the honest error may occur, but if the discovered results are false and you are fabricating data, manipulating images or engaging in such other such activity, and then you can expect serious corrective actions against you. Your professional career and your job will be at risk.

What you can do:

  • Keep thorough records of your experiments
  • Maintain data records after your work is published.
  • Read the instructions carefully for your publication to understand how data and images should be handled.

                                                                                                 To be continued….